Like I said, I wasn’t discussing whether he was funny – or even whether he was right – just trying to explain what he was trying to say. You’re welcome to be as unkind to him as you want.
Let me start by restating that my argument in your other thread was that religions should have unique advantages. If not all religions have them, then the solution shouldn’t be to remove the advantages from those that have them, but rather to add advantages to those that don’t.
Now, if I understood you correctly, you’re asking me to defend the fact that Set religion is the only one that has a poison antidote that doesn’t make you drunk and that cures hangover at the same time.
My answer is simple: why does this need defending?
If we’re approaching this from the game balance point of view, I’ve already stated my position, i.e. that it’s fine if one of the religions has something you can’t get without it, something that no other religion has, as long as every religion has one such thing.
If we’re approaching this from the role-playing or lore point of view, I don’t see a problem with it, either. Contrary to what some people might think, there is no magical cure for hangover. You can treat some of its symptoms, at the risk of doing damage to your body, but you can’t actually make it magically go away in an instant. So if any in-game cure for it is clearly magical, why shouldn’t it come from a religion whose patron deity is associated with sorcery and poison?
I suspect that the answer to my counter-question is “because my character can’t drink a single alcoholic drink without getting a hangover later, and that’s fuсking stupid”.
And I agree. It’s stupid to get a hangover from one beer. So if we’re going to get up in arms about changing something, why not that? 
Isn’t it funny how you making fun of me for using one animated gif at the end of a long and detailed reply is not an ad-hominem attack, yet my responding in kind by pointing out your own problems with communication is one? 
Would it surprise you to find out that English is not my native language either and that I’ve been living in the US for less than 1/4 of my life? 
But like I said when I responded to your attack with one of my own, I don’t really care about your English or your grammar or anything like that. Ask @stelagel if I’ve ever given him any shіt for not being a native English speaker. The difference is that @stelagel isn’t someone who immediately lashes out at others because they don’t agree (or don’t seem to agree) with him. 
So yeah, I won’t respond with an ad-hominem as long as you extend me the same courtesy.