Ahhh no, you misunderstand. My argument is that a hangover cure, which any pothecary at the time would tell you just to drink a couple of drinks, the poison has no relevance to my argument whatsoever, I wholeheartedly believe Set followers should have the antidote to poison and the best poison exclusively.
So, to restart from what I argue: The only viable cure for a hangover should not be paired with the Set Antidote, that is all.
I congratulate you thoroughly for your command of the English language being it not your mother’s tongue, and I envy you for your fluidity within it, I wish I could speak write like that… alas, I do not. That, however, is utterly irrelevant to the argument, and an ad-hominem attack. I did not attack you personally, and one could argue the predictable GIFF was the first salvo; yet, I did not stoop to personal insults, that was only done by you.
Seems more than It is you who lashes out at a dissenting argument… particularly if it makes sense. Either way, please use good dialectic /shrug.
I shall bow out of this argument and just leave this here, I bore. Again, congratulations on your command of the language, which we will not even read for peace of mind sake, have at it =]
2 Likes