I didn’t misunderstand. Please read what I wrote.
Again, I acknowledge and addressed that. In fact, I dedicated most of the middle part of my post to just that. It all started with a simple question: why? What, exactly, is your objection to it? Is it balance? Is it lore? Is it role playing?
I wrote in detail about what I think about those questions. You don’t have to read what I wrote, but if you don’t want to read it, just let me know that’s the case, so I don’t spend my time trying to discuss this further. If, on the other hand, some part of what I wrote is unclear, let me know what, and I’ll try to express myself better.
Yes, you did. Twice:
That was what you said in reply to my description of unique advantages that different religions in the game have. I wrote that description in direct reply to your specific question – “what other religion has an item that is so crucial as that Antidote?” – and your reaction to that was to not only accuse me of not reading your posts, but to call me selfish.
Then there was this:
“It is to be expected”, really?
Again, you call me selfish for writing a direct reply to your question, and you don’t consider that an attack. You write a snide comment about how I used a gif when replying to you, and you don’t consider that an attack.
In short, it’s okay for you to be hostile, dismissive, and rude, but if anyone reacts in kind, that’s not okay. There’s a name for that kind of asymmetry in application of personal standards, but I’ll leave it to the reader to infer it, lest I be accused of personal attacks again 
Won’t be the first time. In fact, you’ve been thoroughly consistent about it.