Looks like the ole 46 in a 45 example needs to come back.

Wrong. A bridge is a violation of land claim. It truly is that simple, especially when players themselves have been banned for it.

Well at least you see that your bridge is a violation.

True and its still a violation. Just like a staircase that lets you run over a mountain is a convenience, and might be a 100% net benefit compared to climbing, but its still a violation.

Indeed yet another violation if said thing caused server or client lag, both of which are violations. However, one could argue that if you put things such as animal pens, thrall wheels or stations that it would become a water base rather then a bridge. At that point more answers from Funcom would be needed to be 100% certain, but Id think that if it was your main base, that it would be ok and not a violation of land claim just because you built on a bridge.

Yet somehow trying to justify one violation over another makes you appear like everyone else on the forums debating the rules - some just dont need to be rules. Thats why, just like you said in another topic, everyone will read the rules and interpret them differently. Just like you are now, thinking your single lane bridge is a convenience and ok, when indeed people have been banned for it.

Hey, I agree, but its still a violation. Now, aside from what the debate is here, I do agree that bridges should not be violations since they serve a useful purpose. However, now you see why Funcom has stupid, idiotic, non thought out ideas they call rules.

Youre trying to make a point that doesnt matter.

1 Like