I replied to you with an example of what goes wrong with the size. Why do you not respond to it but keep hammering on the ALL female berserkers part of the OP that is totally not relevant anymore since it was quite quickly shown A not to be true and B not only happening to the berserkers but also as i showed to other models that are not appearance locked.
I play on 2 servers, official and one that has a mod that lets you change the appearance of thralls. That mod had a max size of 1.5 where i now have a thrall there when opened has a size of 1.648, a size so large it was not possible a few patches back.
Also as i showed with my screenshots thralls now change in size when you place them and move them, something that was not the case in the last age.
So in points:

  • In the previous ages thralls had a size that was consistent when placed and when not placed
  • In this age the size of some thralls was suddenly a lot bigger then was possible before
  • The size of those thralls was not consistent for that thrall if it was placed or not.
  • It was not a documented feature in one of the patch notes
    Result, there is a bug with the female sizes going on. If Funcom’s goal is bigger overall sizes then they should fix it so that the size is consistent.
2 Likes