Durable Heavy Armor

Durable Heavy 2 Durable Heavy

I think something may be wrong with the Durable Heavy armor. it’s more expensive, has no thermal qualities, and has lower armor than the original. It is more durable, but for the cost, it should at least be equal to the original.

3 Likes

Did you notice the weight?

2 Likes

yeah, another thing that’s worse. its amusing the flavor text says it’s better in every way, but it’s actually worse in every way except durability

3 Likes

If the information in those screenshots is accurate and it’s not just the game failing to display the statistics properly, there’s more than “something” wrong there.

Durability is a big factor for me when choosing weapons and armor, so I can definitely appreciate a +50 % increase in durability in exchange of some loss in other stats - but significantly less armor, no heat or cold protection, no stat bonuses, and double the weight is just way too much. The weight alone is a dealbreaker for me - I need to be able to move and carry loot around, too.

4 Likes

Personally armor is about stats. This chest piece is worse than the godbreaker chest piece which is already unusable because it gives no stats and restricts movement but this weighs more than a thrall by no small amount.

2 Likes

Sadly it looks like all Eldarium armor(or atleast the Chieftain Armor) is the same, 59.54 kg, less armor, but atleast it gives stats

It almost feels unintentional. Not sure why the durable variant gives no + to encumbrance.

1 Like

bumping this while also reminding people about this one: Conan "royal" armor bonus set /bug

It looks so bad, I wonder if the Delving bench is setting random attributes.

It isn’t, because it can’t.

This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.