Many of us have asked and debated what sort of clarification you all need and none of you have been able to agree on what exactly that is, nor have been able to articulate it in a way that isn’t in itself vague. This is the entire irony of the situation. You ask for Funcom to be less vague, but are in turn too vague for them to understand exactly what you need.
At some point you all need to understand and accept that Funcom simply doesn’t have the ability to explain it any further down to meet your needs. This is the issue when humans communicate with other humans. It is also a problem when a culture speaks with another culture, doubly so when the languages being used are not first languages.
To put it shortly, these are game designers, not social workers.
Personally I would say to err on the side caution when it comes to interpretation of rules. This is always the best practice when in any establishment or institution that has policy, regulation, law, or rules. I’m reminded of the grooming standards of AR 670-1 of the US Army concerning mustaches for male soldiers. What one NCO believes is in regulation another may not. It was simply easier as a lower enlisted to just keep the damn thing shaven off. That is a successful organization that has been around for over two centuries and yet has way more issues with rule interpretation (interpretation of AR 670-1 is only a small example) than a Funcom rented Conan Exile Official Server.
But if it is that important to many of you. I’m sure your local jurisdiction does have the aforementioned social worker that can probably reasonably interpret those rules and guidelines for you in a way that will make somewhat better sense.
But again, my advice on erring on the side of caution is probably a good idea, even then. And I would definitely worry about one’s own self, and not what ‘others get away with’. I’ve always held the philosophy of ‘keeping one’s own house clean’ in that regard, rather than worrying over some abstract notion of fairness.