And what do all of these things have in common Glurin? I’ll give you a hint. SCIENCE! What is the one thing you refuse to admit is correct when you want to push your conspiracy theories? I’ll give you another hint. SCIENCE!. So which side of the above scenario does that put you on then?
I’m guessing it’s not the side you happen to think that it is.
All of those examples you stated were proven to be possible via science. Yet you refuse to admit when science proves that something is NOT possible, or is NOT the cause of something. 
Absolutely and unequivocally false. First off, you still are not using the word theory.
A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can incorporate laws, hypotheses and facts.
So, the CORRECT stance to take when you do not have the proper information at your disposal is I DO NOT KNOW. Not “maybe”, but simply, “I do not know”. Then you do the research and follow the experts in the fields of study that directly work in the matter you are questioning and determine what the preponderance of evidence supports. And then you respond, “based on the available data, the best possible answer at this time is ____”. But most certainly not “maybe”.
When the research and data show that the “suggestion” is simply not possible, then rejection is the best answer. To not reject what is not possible and then to claim “well it’s possible, prove me wrong” is dishonest.
Nope, that would be faith. Science does not work that way. Your entire goal in science is to attempt to DISPROVE, not to prove and accept blindly.
Again, that is not how science works. Science adjust and corrects as better knowledge is acquired and better methods are developed. What was once believed, but has since been proven to be in error, is discarded for a better answer. That is how progress is made, that is how working with an open mind to find the best possible answer with fact based data driven evidence works.
So once again, I have asked you repeatedly to provide said fact based data driven peer reviewed evidence to support your claims. You still have not provided even one scap. Will you do so now that I have given you a better understanding of what science is and how science works and frankly, what a theory even is? Or will you continue to ignore, deflect and attempt to avoid all efforts to do so?