Then why is it every time I talk in a discussion involving land claim do you jump down my throat, saying things like my opinion doesnt matter because of my bans from land claim, and that the cause of my first ban, a bridge, which you yourself advocated for is enough reason to belittle me and my opinion?

I have not replied to your comments on this. This does show that you are not following what Im saying to you, and reinforces the fact that you are trolling and not having a conversation.

Sure, that is one part of it. But a potatoe PC or a 10 year old Xbox is also part of that same problem. We can agree with that right?

The spelling errors made this really hard to follow. Ok, we arent on crossplay.

Think of the size of the base and its amount of placeables A 10x10 with 100 placeables.

An Xbox player on an Xbox server walks by and it lags them out. Client side, they can report it if they want since client side lag is listed in the ToC as I have linked. This could result in a ban, even though no sensible person would do it. Point is - it is bannable

A PC player walks by the exact same build on a PC server and doesnt suffer the lag.

Yet the rules show one can and will be banned and not the other. Same rules, but they arent applied equally due to hardware.

Thats what Im saying.

See how this contradicts this:

You would agree with me if you didnt think that a violation was a violation. I have given examples and the forums certainly has of very minor infractions (heres where the 46 in a 45 zone comes in) which results in bans. This angers people because in the grand scheme of things, it doesnt matter. Its someone that is emotionally hurt over a build, or thinks they are saving the universe that cause such anger.

So when you defend the reporters actions, lay blame on the person who is reported either for their build or for being upset at who reported them it clearly shows that you are on the side of “a violation is a violation”

Heck, look at the link that Kikigirl put just above. Umborls even states after looking at a screenshot with a clear violation of the rules (the long walkway with torches) that HE HIMSELF cant see any issues. The fact that the guy that tried to write us all clear examples of land claim cant even see it when presented with evidence shows how piss poor the rules are, how bad people are at attempting to interpret them, and how badly they can be at enforcing them. Its time for a change.

After two weeks of this, its enough. Until the next land claim thread.