Even if your remarks are founded and we make sense, because I know that it is permeated that a poorly rated or subject to Pollimique is not seller, I find this start from the publishers and Vendors completely hypocritical.
As cited above in certain games (GTA) and other we can assassinate, kill passers by car Sell illegal substances etc …
I think that the public simply not the same values ​​as the censor.
For example Dayz is prohibited in Australia because players can take care of themselves with grass but not out that there is canibalism!? .
Nudity can pose problem I understand it, but if we explain our children to make the share of things between a naked human (it’s nature) without shocking or provocative poses I think he will understand the situation, on the other hand we cannot legitimately show murders and your abominations seen on certain games.
our monotheist religions we tended to make us forget that in the past Light of us lived naked and some cultures find nothing to complain about this.
For my part I do not consider that as a problem if this one (nudity) is not provocative or shocking.
With regard to the opinions of the censors I have seen visits that very relatives do not take it into account when buying a media for their children, as for the seller, having a lot of the eyes of the moment when a sale is do .

1 Like