Right, following on the footsteps of barbarism never ended badly. Soooo… you argument is nobody would choose Set for poison arrows, those alone are worth the religion in my view, as overpowered as they are. Now tell me, honestly, what other religion has an item that is so crucial as that Antidote? My stament complains about what I think makes Set a religion you can compare to no other, please, if your argument is coherent, give me one item that any religion offers that compares in importance to that antidote… one. So my quarrel is not a paladin complaining he can’t break his oath, were you to read it carefully, it’s about an unbalanced religious mechanic you speak of; what… does the night eye potion compare in any way? Only example I can come up with, but night eye is an abyss away from the relevance of this antidote.
If you think is fine to choose a deity for usefulness and not for principle, you negate the whole faith infrastructure, and when you give a religion such a wide advantage over all the others, I think I can call this out as unfair: My paladin is not complaining he can’t break his oath, he is complaining your game mechanics are unbalanced greatly. BTW the nature of D&D is balance, not a lop-sided item that makes all other religions virtually pointless by comparison.
Oh, and, if your argument is cohesive, explain Crom.