It was not an argument. It was a suggestion about why we have a problem communicating. Do you think we have no problem understanding each other whatsoever? Or do you “feel like you need” to make everything into an argument?
“You’re being evasive”, says the person who demands objectivity without providing any objective arguments. 
Except that’s not what I said, or even implied. Kindly don’t put words in my mouth, especially when you’re pulling them out of a nether dorsal orifice.
What I did say is that a so-called QoL change is bad because a significant portion of users claims that their user experience has been negatively impacted.
Again, I’m not sure what “ouroboros” is supposed to refer to in this context. If you meant “circular logic”, that has a form of “A => B, therefore B => A”. While “because X said so” is certainly not a valid argument, it’s also not circular logic.
Anyway, it’s clear you’re not actually interested in anything other than dispensing vague Delphic utterances and being hostile to those who point out there might something wrong in what you said, so I’ll leave you to it without bothering you anymore.
3 Likes