While this one is not necessarily in agreement with all points in the table, this one does stand by the Crux that
Is not a reasonable stance.
If one doesn’t show up at the time and place of a game, one loses by forfeit.
Those who cannot be bothered to attend to battle have forfeited their stake in it’s outcome.
Yes, “it’s just a game”.
So those who want it more can win and those who lose can take comfort that they have other things in their life they attend to.
There are numerous issues with the PvP in this game, some are 'sploits, others are features.
Restricting PvP opportunities to a game of mother-may I with one’s prey is, honestly, a bit absurd to this one.
This is a Hyborian Age game. Most of us are playing taint mongering Sorcerors, Priests of evil extraplanar entities, or murderous Slavers, if not all at once. Not exactly the pillars of consideration and fair play.
If one doesn’t want their pretty castle destroyed, and doesn’t want to actively protect it, they can either play in private, or in a mode where those Lego lodges are not fair game.
Plopping down some foundations and then telling everyone, not only can you not build there, but you can only evict me on my own terms is not productive.
Raid windows are a more than sufficient tool for giving everyone present reasonable opportunity.
That said, there should be a greater diversity of raid windows to choose from when one seeks a server. The tool is not being used to it’s fullest. It appears that almost all servers in a particular zone are all raid ok at the same time. That is an issue as it disenfranchises those who work swings or graves.
As for the equally absurd “PvB” statement.
Very funny. This one chuckled.
This isn’t Hellish Quart or Bushido Blade or For Honor.
Fortifying is part of the game.
If your base is poorly fortified, that’s because you (the player) are not actually good at the game. You may be great at other aspects of it, but when it comes to the thing that seperates PvE-C from PvP, you are deficient.
Yes, the game needs more passive defense options alongst with several other issues addressed…
But pretending one’s base being a failure doesn’t reflect on their clan that built it being failures is disingenuous in the extreme.
It’s like complaining that one sucks at running, so baseball should only involve pitching, hitting and catching.
There are numerous places one can build in and put up a bubble and then not ever be in peril so long as the bubble stays up.
Lazy, cowardly, and ugly? Yes.
But that’s the game. Like it or not, those are the rules.
Now, as an option for private servers, 100% yes the tool of offline protection should be available to the admin.
But it should not be on public servers unless land claim is disabled at the very moment that the structure becomes invulnerable.