please point to the line where I “insult you”!
Use the quote function.
Again, giving out voice recording do not connect you to being the man in question.
Even a scan of a legal ID with a picture, could be AI generated in 2024.
And if you actually did that, in response to a random dude on the internet, you have definitely the traits of a complete nutcase.
I mean the steps you took so far are already indicative of that anyway. You are definitely not helping your case in any shape or form.
and out of flags.
@stevereno
If you have a problem with someone, take it to the court and let a judge decide.
Otherwise, keep this private and to yourself.
You’re exposing yourself to legal action because of this.
I do find it intriguing that despite there being no moderation on staff here, this post has persisted.
Typically, a certain faction will cause the system to hide and purge threads like this, yet this one still exists.
I wonder why. And I think it’s unfair and unfortunate that someone as good and pleasant as Andy would be targeted and at the same time be unsupported.
its like that street preacher you pass on your way to the coffee shop in the morning, going on about the end of the world.
you only pay attention to him if you are just as crazy as he is.
You don’t really want me to go into all the flaws present in a Pro Se case where the Plaintiff is willing to taint Discovery and Evidence by posting unverified and potentially libelous claims on a public message apparatus.
You mean claims have been made to those particular officials. Anyone can do this, at any time. It probably won’t help your case to know that in Indiana you can be punished under the DMCA of 2001 for knowingly using a software platform and/or Intellectual Property for the targeted furtherance of tortious actions.
What facts?
No investigator will hand over information from an active investigation.
You are thusly driving me from any form of empathy to outright enmity.
Anyway as said @Raudl It is your word and only your word that is highlighted here.
There is no proof that your words are true or that the photos published are yours .
We have no means of verifying what you say, you remain anonymous behind your screen (alas the internet allows certain actions contrary to ethics due to anonymity).
Furthermore, if the facts are true they are not up for debate here.
your action is pure wickedness with the sole aim of causing harm.
If the trial takes place as you assert , the judges have not rendered their verdict and the presumption of innocence takes place until the verdict which convicts or clears the defendants. any statements contrary to the verdict of justice are pure defamation.
Because no one from Funcom looks at the forums on weekends. Monday morning these will disappear.