However - Jimbo is very insistent (and also states that he has ‘confirmation from sources he is not allowed to give details on’ (whatever that means…). I’m 100% that the Exiled Lands are in some sort of ‘pocket realm’ (‘Snowglobe theory’ - which I believe was your term originally?). Jimbo has pushed me (with decent evidence) to around 95% that it’s the Dreamlands specifically, but I could still be persuaded of an alternative. What I cannot be persuaded on is ideas like ‘it’s on the coast of the Vilayet’ (as has been claimed with very poor evidence in the past).
However - where you are very correct is that I should not state that ‘as fact’. It is not proven canon. (Though it is the only plausible explanation for the Exiled Lands, in my opinion.)
The Giant Kings occupied what would be considered Stygia, and likely some of the surrounding area. Then the Khari arrived and defeated them (though some of the nobility likely stayed behind and mixed with the nobility of the Khari which would explain why the Stygian nobility look rather different than the typical Stygian, and my Conan confuses Akivash who pre-dates the Hyborian Age for being of the Stygian Nobility when there were not even any Stygians at that time [but the “pre-human civilization” they overthrew did in fact exist in the Thurian Age).
Funnily enough, I had this exact debate with Jimbo fairly recently, except with him pushing a little more of a ‘Giant Kings were Acheron’ type position. (A lot of the argument centred on Rippke, who I maintain does not make clear enough distinction between what he can prove and his own head-canon.) Xaltotun was another factor brought up as having relatively ‘inhuman’ appearance and great height (though I maintain that, while it could indicate Giant King ancestry, the ‘inhuman’ element can as likely come from being a demonic sorceror).
I still maintain that while the Stygian nobility (and Acheronian) could show some evidence of Giant King ancestry, that is not required to create the difference betwen them and Stygian commoners, since the commoners are heavily intermixed with other surrounding races (and slaves). I’m also not convinced that Akivash is evidence of Giant King ancestry - that factor you bring up of Conan mistaking her for Stygian nobility can also be explained by their Khari ancestry (which we know for certain for both Stygia and Acheron).
Either way, I accept the high likelihood that the ‘Pre-human civilisation’ was most likely the Giant Kings (though maintain a small possibility that it could have been a different pre-human civilisation and the Giant Kings could have been elsewhere - but most likely they are one and the same). So it is certainly not impossible that the Giant Kings interbred with their Khari destroyers - I just don’t think it is proven/provable.
(Side note - I’m well aware you’ve read it, but in case you don’t always have easy access to it, my first post in this thread contains a link to the Guttenberg online edition of ‘The Hyborian Age’ (because I keep it bookmarked for easy reference. lol).)
Actually he did. Twice. You might want to bush up on them but well… lets just say… they did NOT end well for the Aquilonians. You can read Beyond the Black River yourself to see just how spectacularly that one went.
Then there was the expansion and colonies set up into Cimmeria, and the battle at the fort known as Venarium. The Cimmerians devistated the Aquilionian military so dramatically, and a 12 year old Conan took part in this battle mind you, that Aquilionia pulled out of Cimmeria fully and never attempted another incursion again. So yeah, their history of colonizing foreign lands is.. less than successful.
Yup. Timeline-wise I’m not sure exactly when Beyond the Black River would fit with Conan’s supposed brief interlude in the Exiled Lands - I’d place it as probably after he leaves. But Venarium has definitely happened by this point.


