Can you people stop messing the game with every supposed fix

Since the last I would say 4 updates this game has been trash. After the first of the 4 my entire game deleted so I had to start over. After every update including this one today I’ve lost my best thralls, horses, armor and my character keeps changing to a white guy with long white hair. The 3rd update was when the grey ones all stopped having weapons and I could no longer do surges. I thought this latest update would fix everything but somehow it’s worse. Now not only did I lose thralls, horses and other things. Not only did it not fix the grey ones or the surges but now all of my benches don’t work. I can’t even ride a horse which I have to lvl a new one cause the one I had before the update deleted. But now I can’t make a saddle because none of my benches work. Funcom I would like to continue playing so can you fix the damn problems

3 Likes

Think before a removal or fix, cause and effect, this would have solved a lot of the issues, not that they don’t do good fixes its just poor implementation and not foreseeing the outcome of what could happen otherwise, back then feeding thralls kept it in check they never implement a cap until a bit later if I recall. Otherwise if they thought a bit more before the final decision and implemented it they could avoid a lot of hassle.

If its not broken don’t fix it, if you MUST FIX IT, its not broken ask community of loyal people.

I’ve pushed for a player counsel but a couple of people I’d want on it have already quit.

1 Like

All we need is a roll back. It would solve every issue that the last “update” introduced. It would get rid of this horrible new UI. It would make the game fun again.

I think that since Age of Sorcery launched the game has been in a pretty bad place, and it’s been less and less fun to play with each subsequent update.

At this point it would cost every one everything they have earned, built, or paid for since the update.
It would actually cost EVERYONE more then some lost in the update.

You do understand that right?

Sometimes sacrifices need to be made. The game going back to something that worked a lot better, was more user friendly, and was still fun to play would be worth losing all of those “virtual achievements” and progress if that was necessary.

If you think that’s how it would have to work, if you think rolling back a patch would mean everything players have done would be rolled back, then I’ve got news for you - as usual you’re wrong.

Rolling back a patch wouldn’t necessarily have to undo every single thing players have done since the patch was implemented, just like implementing a new patch or update doesn’t wipe all prior progress and require us to all start from scratch. If you think that a roll back of a patch must mean a roll back of every single thing that happened since that patch then you know just as little about coding as I suspected back when you said MS Dos was a programming language.

People can be reimbursed rather easily for virtual achievements, game progress, and any virtual content that they purchased. All of those things are tracked in some manner meaning that compensating players for any roll back related losses would not be all that difficult. Surely you must know that.

Prove it, you’re voicing an opinion you can’t back up that is why it’s not a fact.

The nemedian foundation “fix” cost people hoards of content a good part of which isn’t replaceable. What compensation did funcom give people for that?

If you started a poll now and asked if people wanted the game rolled back I think you’ll find the majority of people wouldn’t share you opinion.

More over if some one started a poll and asked if they could have one change rolled back I doubt the UI/menu sort would be the over whelming choice. I think it would be landslide for the dyers bench.

But hey you just keep tilting at that windmill K?

They need to do what DbD has begun to do albeit far late in the process put out a survey/questionnaire that allows for the players to offer their imput and then offer suggestions and stuff they would like to see.

This has actually been insanely beneficial to DbD’s developers as I said this needed to be added years ago for DbD this needs to be now for Conan.

This UI isn’t bad but it should have been a optional one, I personally find it difficult to do some stuff and easier to do others needless to say it shouldn’t have been a forced choice.

To the other topic you somehow replied to in the same post, I believe while age of sorcery is fun all updates have there down side however I have found every update fun with a side of pain.

I would actually want the roll back of invisible enemies lol. I MISS THEM.:pleading_face:

Well, crouching should make you invisible. In most games it does.

2 Likes

I’m not really sure if you understand what a roll back is…
If you do and you are asking for a roll back to ages ago, you aren’t in a sound mind mate. That will NEVER happen.

5 Likes

As far as I can see in the forum, THAT being considered reasonable argument is what never happens.

2 Likes

No but it does prevent you from falling off cliffs and fountain structures. :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:

Prove it? Well, personal experience and basic computer, database, and programming knowledge tells me it’s 100% possible. I rolled back Cyberpunk 2077 from their overhaul 2.0+ updates and patches to the 1.63 legacy patch with zero loss in progress, no issues or bugs. I have rolled back 7 Days to Die to prior patches as well. So have thousands of others. I rolled back some Windows updates recently, too, and I lost no data. Even installed an old version of a program in Windows and had no issues doing so. So, program, game, and OS roll backs can happen with no loss of data and functionality.

Funcom has access to the last patch - as we all do - on the Steam database. It’s as simple as patching the servers, and clients, back to pre-update status and making sure, just like you do with a patch or an update, that nothing gets broken in the process. If you can’t understand how that works that then I can’t help you understand, you claim to know programming and computers but every time you say things like this it becomes more and more obvious that you only THINK you do.

Not sure why you’re struggling with the fact that if an update or patch can be implemented without wiping progress that it’s also possible to re-implement (or roll-back to) and old update or patch without wiping progress.

So no actual proof just your opinion, gotcha :+1:

I know exactly what it is, and I know exactly what I’m asking for - and why. Don’t start acting like DeaconElie, please. We don’t need more people like that around here.

Why don’t people understand that an update can be designed so it puts things BACK to the way they used to be without people losing progress, just like other updates and patches are implemented without people losing progress?

No, it shouldn’t do that in Conan Exiles, and it shouldn’t do that in most games either. It’s a silly video game trope.

That’s not a roll back.
You want old features back and want them to remove months of development from the game (which has unforseen consequences) . That won’t happen either. At this point you’re like a dog barking at the moon. The moon doesn’t give a f.
Forget those silly ideas and be happier.

2 Likes