It will be even harder to go solo in this game, if you are 2+ player you can always bost up to the hard cap but no chans as a singel player!!
1 Like
There is already a thread discussing thisâŠ
@Ignasi @Hugo
Needs to be folded into that.
@Masmassu this is how come we can never get responses from CMs. A great tool is the search area to see if similar posts already exists. Feel free to join those discussions.
7 Likes
No its no topic on this, its other about the update but not about this part!
1 Like
Actually it is. Many are mentioning that. Again, just trying to keep more f9cus in one spot so CMs can actually process. oh well enjoy.
1 Like
No its not!!!
1 Like
Iâm a solo player and I still think the limit should be lower.
8 Likes
Yes maybe, dont know but the problem is that the limit for a singel player will be 65 folowers and a clan whit 2 player is 180. A quite big gap ther.
1 Like
Clan with 2 players - 80 (soft one). Single player hard cap - 165, clan with two players - 180.
1 Like
No its 180, thats how the system work⊠Sadly
1 Like
You have base - 50 and +15 for each clan member. 50 + 15*2 = 80.
1 Like
And a cap on + 100 on that! so total 180
1 Like
So this is a hard cap. When comparing hard caps, the solo player will have 165. Why are you trying to compare different limits?
When you reach the soft limit, you can no longer place new companions. When you reach hard, the companions are removed.
1 Like
No the soloplayer will never be able to bump up the extra +100 never ever after the system gos live but will be NP for 2+ member clan.
So back to how it is:
that the limit for a singel (or last activ player in a clan, but then you only get the extra +15/members) player will be 65 folowers and a clan whit 2 player is 180. A quite big gap ther.
1 Like
Well, 2 players can only get 65 * 2 = 130, not 180. But when the companions are killed. Theyâll have to split up and hire them again. It doesnât make much sense, considering that the avatar will still kill almost all satellites in the affected area when attacking.
No it 180 and nothing ells⊠its just put 100 thralls in youre pocket and exit the clan plase them and then join again. And puff you have 180 folowers in the clan but a soloplayer are stuck whit the 65. only diferens from a 3 + clan is that you have to do that 2 times.
After you leave the clan, you can only plaŃe 65. Because you are a solo player. And the second person will not be able to bet more than 65. Total when they combine will be 130.
Yes then you join and leav again and put out the next 35,
No, 65 followers is not a âdeath for solo playersâ in PVE. You might not like the limit, and thatâs your right, but saying that itâs âdeathâ is a ridiculous exaggeration.
The only reason why you would need more than 65 followers in order to survive in PVE is if you have a huge claim that needs to be defended from swarm-type purges, like Cimmerian Berserkers or Sobek Cultists. If thatâs the case, you have several options:
- be a good neighbor and reduce the claim
- rely on the rest of the server community to help you
- move to a private server where they donât mind huge claims
4 Likes
But you still cant use the hard cap as bigger clan can! But whit youre arguing it makes even more when bigger clans cap is 180+, 3 tims more then a singel player. That makes it even more unbalansed.
Then jump is a big problem!
Are we still talking about PVE? Because you tagged this topic as PVE. Thereâs no âimbalanceâ in PVE, because youâre not competing with other clans.
âI canât place as many followers as a clanâ is at least debatable, although that particular debate would boil down to âduh, thatâs why itâs a clanâ.
âNot being able to place as many followers as a clan makes me unable to survive in PVEâ is not even debatable. Itâs plain false.
2 Likes