That seems to be true.
That’s not a valid argument either, and bareley comparable… and you know that.
Structual integrity gives you the ability to place like 2 additional ceilings, while beast of burden allows you to carry as much bombs as you want.
And if we‘d lose the additional stability, nobody would use this perk because we‘d be forced to stay with it. (Would make it impossible to switch to a fighter build EVER)
Buildings by themselves can’t fight or move, you can come along with beast of burden and blow all buildings to hell no matter if there is a few more ceilings.
Structual integrity is not unfair or unbalanced, a permanent beast of burden would be!
And this small bit gives me the impression that you are a pvp-player that has a hatred against this perk for some reason.
I guess you are indeed also a little bit biased when it comes to that perk, @Eradicati0n made a whole video only about that.
And you can’t tell me none of these hundreds of buildings are built without Structual integrity.
Simply removing that perk or the lasting benefit would cause lot of trouble, belive that.
If FC removes that perk and gives us that additional stability permanentley… FINE
Would be fine by pretty much everyone.
But if FC would change it the way you suggested it, the forum would be on fire! It would be like nemedian foundation bug all over again!
But i guess have to agree to disagree.
As i said the other 68 points i could get behind 