Funcom make up ur mind, stop giving us new structures if you will wipe us

Yes, And this was one of the single stupidest and alienating EXCUSES given by Funcom to date at least as far as for new players (if there is anymore at this point) and players who do not want to play on Admin powertrip lands (aka. privates servers) . I say excuses as this was in FACT just an excuse to not upgrade their servers to actually make the game function as it should and be playable in a stable state.

Bottomline: To new players and for gamers in the majority the servers the game officially run on (main game owned by the company that developed the game, please don’t try to weasel out on definition, just don’t) is the one that REPRESENTS the game to new players and server as the flagship of the game. People who don’t like this fact all I can say is tough . This is simply how it was, is , and will be as far as the majority of players of video games are concerned.

Don’t want to run your game in a playable state (multiplayer 40/40 as the server states is supposed to be number of players the server was set to allow maximum) ? Fine. Don’t expect players to continue to play and invite their friends over to play either. But, do NOT insult players by saying your OFFICIAL SERVERS are not the servers that the official game is supposed to be played on !

The Nerve.

4 Likes

Yeah I thought that was odd that they don’t run the servers they are responsible for like the game that CE was intended to be. Sounds too much like a cop out excuse to not put resources on officials and placation to the private server crowd where the numbers don’t lie and there are more private servers active than officials.

4 Likes

That’s why there’s so much freedom :man_shrugging: The players who do not want to play on those servers and aren’t okay with the rules on official servers can simply play in single player, or host their own servers where they can become the ā€œpowertripped admin of the landā€ :man_shrugging:

But it’s NOT an excuse… at least it does not seem like one to me… It’s a ruleset specifically tailored to be able fit a lot of people on a server…

It is simply not possible to have it both ways… Atm they have thousands of servers… WITH these strict rules… if they suddenly tell people they can go ham with their buildings you’d need like a server per every 20 player, cuz they’ll have massive towns and a convenient second base set up at each landmark, but then decide hey why not build bridges and overpasses between them as well, cuz there’s not much else to build… :man_shrugging:

A server atm can serve hundreds of players, since just because they’re not all online at the same time does not mean they don’t have a base there and simply log on at different times… if you tell them they can landclaim to their hearts content half of those wouldn’t have an empty spot to build in…

The building system in this game is just too powerful… look at any single player save…
Here’s an example from reddit:


The person did this in a couple of days… Now I’m sure they used creative mode, but it’s not THAT hard to farm mats so without these rules they would definitely have no issue building that on an official server either.
What happens then? They get bored and start a new project somewhere else… but they ofc don’t wanna destroy this, because it’s art, no? You just can’t have that on official servers…

So it’s NOT an excuse… it never was… the capabilities of the game are NOT in any way represented in official servers and they can never be…

Now you’re confusing TWO DIFFERENT THINGS…

The first one, you’re talking about performance… THIS was not about that in any way…
The topic is NOT about server performance… it’s not about how the server acts when 40 people join… With THAT, I agree and I have said multiple times that they should upgrade the quality of the servers.
It’s about landclaim first and foremost, that what the rules are about. Taking up MORE space than what you NEED (and not what you WANT, because there’s an important difference between the two)

You also seem to be misunderstanding their take on this… They said that in the context of building… just like I explained it above…
So no, that’s not ā€œinsultingā€ players in any way… they’re saying that if you want to hog the map then go play somewhere else… the game ALLOWS for it… official servers DO NOT. That’s it pretty much.

4 Likes

I have gone through your post and fully understand the point you are trying to make, but simply put nothing you have said changes the fact that the above statement that I quoted was a message to convey excusing the poor function of the official servers.

ā€œStandard of the game should be playedā€

The official servers provided (they are paying for them to provided by GPortal wth the OFFICIAL stamp on them by the official owners, developers, and directors of the game are not the standard of how the game should be played and represented ?!? Sorry but, dosesn’t many amount of sense at all. Players do not see it that way and in fact see it the opposite way. The Official server represents the official way game is supposed to be ran and played approved by the officials of the game itself. This is an escapable fact.

Saying it doesn’t make it so, because frankly players are the ones who decide what they feel is the approved and promoted version of the game and majority of players coming into a game or speaking about a game will refer the game that is run and administrated by the developer and runners of the game. This is the stone cold reality of the situation.

Well… that’s pretty much the impression I’m getting from your post…
You disagree with what ruleset they decided to run them with so you’re saying that it’s ā€œnot trueā€ and it’s just an ā€œexcuseā€ā€¦ but you saying that… does it suddenly make it so?..

Oh really? How’s that been working out for you?.. I personally didn’t get any invitations to the shareholders meeting or even the design / direction internal meetings…

So what evidence points you to that fact?..
Because I’m the one who said it and even I don’t really have the official source for it like I said, just heard them and others say it here and there, so have others and so have you.

But I always understood it as a legit justification for the rules and not an excuse for the bad technical performance - there’s a massive difference between those two.

To me it always meant that you are restricted by rules on official servers from using everything that the game has to offer so that you don’t end up hogging the server.
And if I remember correctly this was actually their reply to the constant cherry-picked justification players come up with on a regular basis that the words ā€œbuildā€ and ā€œdominateā€ were being marketed with this game… so they said… ā€œSure… the game allows you to do that… BUT not on our serversā€¦ā€

So if you don’t like that ā€œofficial way of playingā€ you described there… you can feel free to take your game to Single Player, you have that freedom… :man_shrugging:


And if you still didn’t get the distinction, I am not in any way saying that this excuses the fact that the servers themselves are of bad quality and can’t host the amount of players they advertise AND ensure the game remains playable at the same time. So on that note I fully agree… they should really get better servers :man_shrugging:
This thread was mainly about the rules and wipes and landclaim and whatnot and not about server performance.

1 Like

This is such an ignorant BS claim. I am so sick of the uneducated on this forum constantly bashing private servers while constantly complaining about official servers. Having played on both, since early access, and almost exclusively on private servers as of late, I can honestly say this is utter nonsense and the negative things that everyone cries about on the officials (which I have seen first hand as well) I do not experience on private servers. So yeah, if you want to play on poorly run, laggy garbage servers where you can get admin wiped at any moment and possible banned from then sure go right ahead. But stop complaining about it and stop insulting people who run and play on private servers while you do so.

8 Likes

Time will ladies and gentlemen. My words obviously do nothing for you. This is fine as the facts don’t care about your opinion over the opinions of the majority of game players. Read from more than just this forum and visit the voice chats and see what the prevailing point of view is regarding Official servers of a video game. Read is seen to be responsible for their (official servers of a video game) quality and how that reflects on the perceived quality players have on said game.

Gamers opinion matters and first impressions can make or break a game. Right now the first impression of Offical servers is poor and players in majority will attach the responsibility for quality of the developers supported platform (servers) for their game. You simply can not separate responsibly and perception when you label anditem, object, or other material OFFICIAL an not expect players to see it as the reprehensive of their (devs) collective work.

It is not in the end I who needs to be convinced of quality and ownership, but all gamers who would be interested in this game and be turned away from it due to the quality so called Offical servers.

Players do expect to purchase a game and then have to purchase a server after words in order to play this game in a stable state and enjoy the all designed functions of the game in a multiplayer capacity .

In short for enjoyment it is being said purchase the game and then purchase a server to enjoy it.

I simply saying the majority of gamers find this concept unacceptable and will just as simply take their business and time elsewhere. Again, it is not I you need convince.

That is an opinion.


That is the fact.

We don’t have to like facts. But they are true. I don’t like getting older, in my opinion I shouldn’t. But its going to happen anyway, physics are physics.

Physically Funcom provided servers can’t do big builds and open servers. So they don’t.

5 Likes

Again, again, again please understand that the majority of players never visit the website aside from downloading the game and never look at the site again. The majority of them (players) also do not visit the forums to read performance disclaimers and state of the game on the official servers. The majority expect and assume that the official servers are the official way to play the game and will judge the game as it plays on the official servers first and foremost.

Again, it is not I who you need to convince as said before. The majority of players perception of what they see as the benchmark of the entirety of the game. The official server will be the first place that a new player will visit alone or with their friends. This is when they will form their judgment of their enjoyment of the game (first impressions matter folks). Do you see the danger now of the Officials not presenting the game in a favorable light in this critical decision making time. This not the only survival multiplayer game out there and choices are plentiful. These are the facts. Food for thought.

Oh look, Taemien does have some pictures of it :joy:

Wait, are you under the impression that the majority of CE players play on official servers? Just wondering here.

Yup! There are admins who work super hard and their hobby / passion is to provide a GOOD gaming environment for players… They’re not even always players themselves so the ā€œplayer biasā€ is not even a factor that people like to throw into these discussions…

Just like some modders almost never play the game, because their passion is creating the mods and not using them there are server admins who found their thing in managing servers / creating unique things for their players etc.
Maybe Sairdontis needs to try a few servers :stuck_out_tongue:

Its like you guys don’t read the post at all. I said that the majority of players START or PLAY FOR THE FIRST TIME on the OFFICIAL SERVERS. This is the first impression of the game. This is where the majority of players will first judge the game’s quality. They are not going to base their opinion and sense of enjoyment on a website posting that they won’t read or a postings on a forum that they also won’t read.

They will judge the games’ quality on their first play throughs and will do this in the majority FIRST on the OFFICIAL SERVERS. Let me ask you guys a question: What do you think is the average attention span of the majority of gamers today and how long do you suppose you have to capture and keep a players attention on a game that bugs pop up or lags out (frame rates just for one example) on their first run through ? Or they get warned of a banning for building on a game that emphasizes building as one of its major selling and playing points ?

This is not a hard concept to grasp guys. I am not saying that this perception or impression issue is fair, but that is simply the way the majority of the gaming public is . You again don’t need to worry about my opinion(s) on the subject that is not where the problem is.

1 Like

Nah, I read the post, I was asking to make sure.
I think when people try the game they’re sort of split… at least I come across new players on a daily basis who need help setting up a dedicated server because that’s where they want to play with their partner for example… while a lot of others jump into single player first to check out what the game is about without other people influencing it.

CE isn’t exactly a MMO, while PvP requires other people, in PvE they’re just there… but not required in any way.

I get what you’re saying…

You’re saying that new players will automatically try official servers and dislike those so they’ll judge the whole game based on that. Right?

I’m just not sure it’s the case… some will obviously without a doubt… but some might ask further questions, get into private servers, others might just go along with their single player games while others will accept the rules and try to play on official servers as well as they can.

The rules are now displayed in a giant messagebox when you log in… so while not reading them wasn’t an excuse even up to now… not reading them now puts even more of this responsibility on the player.

1 Like

Great a disclaimer warning players on their first login on their first play though is the first thing they see telling them that the gameplay on the Official servers provided by the developer (through a 3rd party host won’t matter to them) will be more than likely be subpar to what they expected. I suppose it might allow them time to refund the game right off the bat. At least they were warned.

That will definitely increase the chances that they will stay playing the game… and excuse completely in their minds a less than enjoyable experience is just what they are just going to have to accept .

You just purchased this game and logged in for the first time and jump on the official servers just to be met with a disclaimer to the game experience not possibly being up to standards, but no fear you can purchase or need to set up a game server to play their game in way it was intended to be played…

Good Luck with this.

I don’t understand what would you like…
I get it that you dislike the current system, but I have very serious doubts you would be able to come up with anything better, or even comparable if you were Funcom… :man_shrugging:

I pointed out above that the building system in this game is just too powerful… if you don’t make any rules then you’d have to supply a server for every player pretty much… which would defeat the purpose as single player is there for that…

The rules are set up so that you share the server… like… do you have a problem with that? You don’t want to share? or what?
You haven’t really defined what exactly is your issue and why you’re so angry about it…

  • Pretty much everyone agrees that the official servers should be upgraded to better quality ones
  • Also as far as I’ve seen everyone agrees that it would be nice if Funcom was more transparent about the enforcement part of the rules. So they supply proper reasons when they wipe… maybe even some sort of a warning system if it’s feasible

However, after this is where I and some others seem to disagree, because you have the ā€œWe don’t need rules, let us build and dominate and hog everythingā€ crowd… and here’s me and others and Funcom saying that official servers should be shared equally and people should only take up as much space as they NEED and not use the public servers as their personal art gallery.

If you have an issue with those two list entries, then welcome to the club :man_shrugging: If however you have a problem with the last one… then by all means… DO go to Single Player or shell out for that private server and enjoy the game along with any new players who feel that they do not need to share :man_shrugging:

3 Likes

Oh it’s fairly obvious what he would like. He would like for everyone to stop talking and just agree with him because he doesn’t want to listen to anything or look at facts that say the opposite of what he might like to think, such as that lovely little screen shot provided by @Taemien

His mind was set in dried cement long before he started this discussion and he will not change it for any reason. It is called the Sunk Cost Logical Fallacy. He has invested to much time and effort into this stand that he simply cannot back down from it any longer.

2 Likes

an unkeep cost would solve a lot of problems, will probally get rid of refreshers (being reported by a refesher was a kind insulting for a player that plays every day) Will make people play more and spent more in game as they will be in touch with promotions and itens in the shop.

2 Likes

That is flat out wrong. They game was very much developed with them in mind. Most adjustments comes directly from officials playthrough and feedback. Like I said earlier, it’s dang strange that FC’s ideal CE play is not supported with their official servers. No one wants to address this elephant in that they are holding a hypocrisy with this in that their official servers refuse to allow the play they promote; leaving administration and players frustrated.

All of this could easily be rectified with a change in a promise they made early on. Periodic refreshing of officials. I mean you can promote the play you want and with the refreshing, officials can support it. It meshing with their stance that officials offer a taste and heavier or long lasting play will require private server investments.

1 Like

I’m at the same spot. I’m just resetting my base in case I decide to actually play again (probably will a bit once the new chapter comes out but not sure for how long). I’ve played so much in the past that is it almost like trying to break an addiction.

At this point I just remember all the folks I met over the years and the epic and fun (online) battles that used to happen.

I play pretty much exclusive PVP and right now the lack of clear rules and the fact that raid balance is sooo bad now pretty much has ended my time playing…

3 Likes

Angry, no. Resigned at this point, yes.

Let sum up your points I guess you have against what I have said.

  • Greedy players bad (building?). They need to learn to share in a game world that is advertised as Conquer. Build. Survive.

  • I don’t know how to share and want to hog up the server resources (wait a second I will get my black hat and mustache).

  • I must be angry for some reason . I don’t get this one, but hey opinions I guess.

Maybe an ingame restrictor that prevents you from building more if you violate the building restriction in that area or server wide. Maybe make this on the player or the clan/ guild as a whole?

The ā€œissueā€ if I even have one is this comes down to satisfying a players perception of the game that they gained from the impression the game advertising gave. Agreed that is a tough one. I would say again upgrade the hardware to the game can play for the players as advertised and the impression given .

Anything beyond that it leaves it up in the air if more players will give this game the time of day or come back to it after a bad experience. Time will tell. I do believe in some ways time has told. Now it is just a question of whether the right people listened to what it said or ignored.

@biggcane55 I seem to remember that being said on a stream about console numbers. That is a tough nut to crack.

Sidenote: Strongly belief that @Oduda may have a reading and/or a comprehension issue. They may need to have the checked out. Cheers.

I did. A dev stream i am not going to spend time finding. It was defibately said, as i remember a ā€œwowā€ monent for me when lisyening. May have been when rob took over combat design.