[Suggestion] Allow us to purchase past battle passes

It feels really counter-productive that people that weren’t present for the live release past content don’t have access to past battle passes simply because they weren’t there at that specific time

The FOMO business strategy employed by tencent is not only predatory, but downright foolish from a business standpoint. Why deny yourselves additional income from new players that were tardy to the party?

I (and plenty of other people) would happily pay money to unlock these past battle passes on our account so that I can put in the time and effort that others in the past did into getting them myself.

The excuse of the developers saying that they’re going to “put up equivalents on the bazaar that only look similar to the ones in the bazaar.” This feels not only like a waste of resources, for both developers and the playerbase, but also extremely condescending toward a community that only wants to support Funcom / Tencent.

I recall Funcom braggng about how the changes were done in the player’s best interest when the introduced age of sorcery. That feels like it couldn’t be further from the truth. Putting up the limited time carrot-on-a-stick feels more like a method of captivating your audience in a pretty disrespectful way.

3 Likes

There was a thread a few years ago. It was about the pre-order items being available again for purchase. The community expressed itself saying they enjoyed the exclusive nature of the Atlantean Sword and Royal Armor.

Funcom listened to them. And pretty much think these requests are from salty players who missed out. Because this community told them that is what they were when they asked for the pre-order items.

Okay but this thread is about battle passes, lol

I’m explaining to you that it was FOMO then, the community liked it, and therefor nothing will happen now. You missed out.

1 Like

Okay but this thread is about battle passes, lol

1 Like

Yeah and the Community wanted more exclusive items. They got them. That’s the Battlepass.

Yes, exclusive items we as members of the community are able to pay for in exchange of access.

The problem is making each of these DLCs available for only a limited time with no chance of purchasing them again later simply because we couldnt buy it while it was out.

It wouldnt be a problem to keep them available the same way they have the DLC packs for sale in the bazaar.

1 Like

@Taemien, please remind this one, who in the community, wanted more exclusive items? This one has a confirmation bias, so does not trust remembering a laundry list of posters’ outcry against FOMO that was poo pooed down by about three posters whom this one remembers by name.

That aside, as much as this one loathes the Battle Pass system, it’s a forlorn hope to see re-release.
They may reskin some (arcane curio cabinet and arcane bookcase are the same placeable, but with a different paint job), but this one would suggest against breath holding.
The current monetization system probably isn’t even under Funcom’s direct control. They may have input, but they’ve had a “monetization expert” gifted to them by their owners for over a year now.

Edit: One issue this one rankles at is how they track the purchases. Once you make a purchase (or complete a BP) you are locked into the platform acquired on.
Ensuring that those Console players are disincentivized from jumping to PC.

This is what I noticed every time FOMO items come up. It’s cool to have exclusives, but it would be nice to allow access to them for those that missed them. Most everyone that has FOMO items usually say it’s ok with them if the items get released. They’ve had their exclusivity for a good while and it should be released by now. I’ve only seen a small handful minority that have protested it. Something about, “blah blah blah! I earned these items and no one should have them! Blah blah blah!”

I have the Watcher items and would like to see others be able to use them… especially now that others can’t use them if they don’t have the recipe. So, basically, I can’t even share them with anyone. The armor can only be worn by thralls (other than me) and if I want to give someone a placeable, I have to leave my clan and join theirs.

1 Like

if they gave the possibility to buy old battle pass.

They will lose money because the players will not buy everything.
because a large part of the items are bad.

with the current system the active players buy battle pass because otherwise they will be missing forever

Maybe its not all about money.
If you say they would make more money by allowing you to purchase past battle passes.

Battle pass is for specific chapter in specific age.
Perhaps is more important for them to stick to that, rather then choosing you opinion and try making more money…:man_shrugging:

Yeah, I’ve seen some people like that. Those folks are like wannabe country club snobs IMO. “I’ve got more money, therefore I’m just better than you.”

“I own a Farrari…” “I own four houses I never live in…” “I’m a politician…” “I have the pre-order bonus in a video game…”

It’s all the same BS.

Frankly though, I don’t mind a period of exclusivity. But I do think that those exclusive items should be available again at some point in the future.

1 Like

Okk .I do not mind . because I don’t buy

Not really… if it goes the way the current bazaar items are priced, buying stuff randomly later may cost MORE than purchasing the battle pass when it’s new. Fallout 76 allows the purchase of items from past battle passes in its premium item shop at a random rotation. They currently have some items in a bundle that were a part of the first season… and the Fallout 76 seasons are free. Basically, you get it early by completing the pass at a discounted rate (in the case of Fallout 76, free)… a reward for those that play the game when it’s new content.

2 Likes

This one isn’t entirely certain of that .

The Battle Pass is a one time buy in for 1200 CC, which it then refunds.

The cheapest stand alone item this one has seen on the BLB is 250 CC.
Rereleasing would generate revenue due to how the BP works

Personally, while this one detests Battle Passes, this one must give credit due, the one implemented in this game is probably one of the better ones this one has seen. Sure, some of the filler is funny, but it refunds itself and isn’t nearly the obtuse pain in the @$$ many others are.

3 Likes

yes but their objective is to make the player want to waste the money earned in the battle pass in the store.

to then buy the next battle pass.

if you are a thrifty person. you don’t fall into the trap

Ah, this is one of those modern money making schemes aimed at people who have always lived in a debt based society.
How uninspiringly unsustainable.

I was a staunch supporter of bringing the launch exclusives back and at the time there were about 50% of the folks that were for this and 50% that were against this. Heck there were some folks that threatened to quit the game if FC ever offered the day one exclusives to the general public.

Flash forward to AoS chpt 1 release and many of those in favor of the exclusive nature of the day one items talked about FOMO of the battlepass and didn’t evey remotely understand the hypocrisy of what they were saying.

For me, I think the day we see battle pass items introduced into the bazaar will be the day that FC announces they are no longer actively developing and so therefore the time put into the game (including paid content) will be diminished. Certain items maybe worked into the bazaar but they will be tweaked to add distinction to these items and get the sales of those that are battle passers.

1 Like

Why implement “tweaked” items?

Why not just the same item that were already available from before?

Probably because developers who do that see it as a compromise between those that want the items to be exclusive and those that somehow missed out and would like to have a shot at getting those items themselves.

Unfortunately those “tweaked” items usually don’t look nearly as good as the originals. Enough so that they actually end up being rather off-putting most of the time, IMO.