Funcom apparently doesn’t understand that the players have at least been its customers

[DanQuixote]

I have no idea why Nenneke got banned. You have no idea why Nenneke got banned. Nenneke has no idea why they got banned - because, and here’s the key point, Nenneke decided the reason wasn’t worth their time to find out (which they have the right to do or not to do).

@Nenneke

I really don’t care anymore what am I banned for, I accepted the fact that we have overbuild and landclaim too much or really whatever.

So pretending that you somehow know what happened seems a little unreasonable, given that the person involved doesn’t know or care.

@Hel

If Funcom doesn´t want to properly maintain their servers or spend additional money on active Admins then they should close their officials servers for good.

Fine by me. But there are a lot of people that do enjoy playing on those servers. Maybe you shouldn’t decide things like that for them?

@Hel

I doubt that most people are not willing to remove what is too much in a devs eye if Funcom would talk to the reported people first to avoid a ban, which would benefit both sides.

As both @CodeMage and I (and many others) have argued repeatedly. I don’t know why you would imagine that you are the only one who sees this, or that you are the only one to argue it.

@Hel

But instead they are reading a report, joining the server, teleporting to the position and start removing the whole base and everything around it regardless if the base itself is the problem or just what surrounds it

This is the same ‘They destroy any base that is reported’ claim that has been made repeatedly. Show some evidence - not evidence that they might make a mistake in some cases - they have already admitted to that, and it has been made clear repeatedly. Show some actual evidence that they don’t examine the situation and just take all reports as a reason to delete and ban. Because you have no evidence of that, and it’s a pretty serious accusation to make.

@Hel

And the moment you then come here to this forum and say its not ok for you that funcom is handling their incoming reports this way you get a stamp on your head, because you dare to critisize them. Funcom in this forum gets worshiped like god, and we all know, god doesn´t make mistakes.

How many times do I have to explain to you that this is a flat out lie? I have literally just pointed out to you that CodeMage and I have both repeatedly criticised Funcom, and your only response is to make this same BS claim again. Please do me the courtesy of actually reading what I type to you rather than just making things up. As for coming to the forum to complain - if all people can do is come in and say ‘Funcom suck’, then yes, they tend to get pushback. But if they complain sensibly, like for example @Octavian earlier in this thread, then they get sympathy. Much of what you seem to perceive as ‘victim blaming’ is actually people trying to explain how the system actually works and why certain ideas won’t solve it. You repeatedly coming back and trying to pretend that this is people trying to “put a stamp” on people doesn’t change facts.

@Hel

The ship is not part of the actual base

Yes it is - it is in use and contains workstations.

@Hel

its not neccessary to store rum in a seperate building outside the base

Nor is it against any rule

@Hel

if the actual base has enough space to hold it there

Which you haven’t demonstrated is the case anyway.

@Hel

therefor it is spam. Well disguised spam, indead, but still spam.

No it isn’t. And no matter how you try to redefine it, it never will be. But beyond that, as has been repeatedly explained to you - the rules do not mention spam - they state:

@Ignasi

Abuse of the claim system where blocks are placed for no other purpose than to prevent other players’ access to resources and building spots.

@Hel

With your argument I could easily say the same with any wall or towers or other builds that I put around a base.

And as I have already said - walls are fine, we’re talking about spiderwebs of landclaim - stop pretending otherwise, you’ve even been shown images. Towers are also fine - within Funcom’s definition of whatever is ‘too big’ (a separate issue that I have raised multiple times, in this thread and others, expressing that the grey area is a problem). Nowhere do Funcom’s rules suggest you are only allowed to build a square featureless box. Aesthetic building, as I have now told you at least three times, is not prohibited anywhere by the rules.

@Hel

Just because I pop some chests or workbenches ontop of something doesn´t make it automaticly beeing a legit building with a meaning.

Indeed it doesn’t. No one has claimed that it does - but nice strawman attempt.

@Hel

It still prevents others for building there or makes the servers lag or whatever you tell people every time the minute they are posting their complains.

That is a direct accusation that you are clearly and intentionally aiming at me. Show evidence that I have ever done what you are accusing me of. Not only do you ignore repeated explanations, but now you are throwing around false accusations.