Could someone kindly tell me what this is? It’s a threshold, obviously, but you cannot pass.
1 Like
Heh, I used to think @Harperson used sad faces in all my posts because he felt bad about the situation. Today, I realized he simply does not like me, and instead dislikes my posts. Ok well /shrug at least I dispelled the illusion. On with the sad face he goes.
1 Like
That’s been there for a while. You hear the howls.
Ah, k, thanks for taking the time.
1 Like
in my head canon this is the entrance to the vaults of the unnamed city with content that is only available if you have the Isle of Siptah expansion.
Something that explains the extraterrestrial origins of the giant kings or something so evil that the giant kings felt they had to built a city on top of it to imprison it.
3 Likes
Looks more like a yet to be rendered spot in the rock.
You ought to visit it - it’s definitely more than just a spot that hasn’t rendered yet 
I remember finding it and being really intrigued as to what it might be. (I’m still wondering if maybe it is the location for something in the future, or perhaps something that never got finished - or perhaps it was an early possible location for the ‘Sacred Hunt’ cave that got partially set up but then moved to a different spot.)
2 Likes
No, if you click on their profile and read their history, it is nothing personal.
I had a post where he sided with someone that argued that having outdated information in the game’s loading screen was just fine. He can side with whomever he chooses, but their argument seemed illogical to me. It was the first thumbs up I had ever seen him give someone, someone that, to me, was making a nonsensical argument, hence the deduction.
I sincerely do not care, it just seemed odd.
I highly suggest you look at their profile. There’s a wealth of information to give a more informed perspective as to why they give frownies or thumbs up. I get frownies on just about everything I post and I understand why.
Kiki, honestly, they can do as they wish. I find it unnecessary to dig up information about what people say they are; I find it more sensible to judge them by their actions. If you have to explain the way you act, then you are acting on a personal social sub-vector, and quite frankly, Occam’s Razor makes more sense to me, and one is judged by one’s actions, not one’s dossiers. If you are speaking in code, you will easily be misunderstood. However, again, it does not matter at all in the grand scheme of things; he can emote as he pleases.
If you’re suggesting it isn’t that deep and that’s the way you perceive it, perhaps ignoring it would be in your favor. They’re using it in a way to express themselves as best they can with the emoticons available; if there were more then they’d be using a different one that better describes that emotion. This is clear by reading their post history. Believe me or not 
The fact still remains he gave a thumbs up to someone making what I thought was a very illogical argument; hard to understand why misinformation in the loading screens would be just peachy. He obviously has access to thumbs up and sad faces; the choice was very deliberate.
You disagreeing with them thumbing up someone does not make the fact of why they largely use frowny faces irrelevant (which has been explained and you would see this if you read their post history) or that it proves they have something against you. It is possible they misclicked, or thought the opinion or a part of the comment fair or simply disagreed with you.
If you feel this strongly message them for an explanation and context. Or not. Anyway, have a good day 
1 Like
Kiki, how many times have I said it doesn’t matter? What gave you the impression I feel “strongly” about any of this? How odd. Anyway, once more, this matters not, and I shall leave it at that. You have a lovely day yourself =]
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.