So…since we still are guessing what the droprate is for agents I finally jumped my shadow and would like to organize a dropresearch.
Basically people comment with how many missions(with agentdrops)/scenarios/blue enddungeonchests/blue regional chest they got and how many had an agent in it.
It’s not really that important which agent or region it was. What is important is that you don’t cheat about values and don’t cherrypick moments where you didn’t get agents or did get some to warp your figures.
Stay honest and keep exact tabs and once we have enough data we should see a trend forming into a agent dropchance for everyone. Even small amounts help.
Any form is ok as long as she has the sum of missions/scenarios etc seperate (so we don’t mix the scenario and mission droprate in a weird way) and how many agents dropped (I would prefer to also have the opposite value so we always can check drops+nodrops=all)
To keep it simpler to read for me and everyone that uses the dropdata don’t make a new comment but edit old drop data to the new values.
Keep in mind that only rare chest from regionals and last dungeonbosses have a dropchance. Grey chest should be excluded from the data.
Well guess i will start. While i did have two agents early on, i wasnt exactly keeping tabs on how many missions that took. I did just start noting down today however. Not a very good sample size so far i realize that =P.
Don’t worry about the sample size. If enough people join we get the sample size by quantity of people instead of by some people running endless many missions and stuff.
Also big thanks for being the first.^^
So, I’ll skip the missions that I did on top of my dailies because I didn’t exactly count them and don’t want to leave a guess here. Dailies and weekend-scenarios leave me at
Missions: done 130; Agent drops: 0; no drops: 130
Scenarios (E1): done 10; Agent drops: 0; no drops: 10
You can always calculate that probability of the droprate from rare chest as it’S way easier to calculate the probability of rare chests.
Combining the probabilities is just a loss of information, in favor of making the data more approachable without extra calculation.
Sry, for not being able to explain it more easily but point is there is a reason for it.
Can you update the previous post instead of posting every week (I suspect these are the values for this week) seperate. Just makes it easier on my part since I don’t have to crosscheck and add up all from one person myself.^^
